Was FSSAI Sleeping on Spice Safety Issue? Compulsory Testing Ordered Amid Crisis

India's Food Safety and Standards Authority (FSSAI) has now taken action in reaction to serious findings about specific spice mixes from well-known companies. Following MDH and Everest's suspension of sales of some items in Singapore and Hong Kong due to excessive amounts of ethylene oxide (ETO), which can even lead to cancer, the FSSAI has ordered thorough testing of spices countrywide.

Rigorous Inspections and Testing

Under the mandate, FSSAI personnel are tasked for performing extensive inspections, sampling, and testing at all spice production facilities, with a focus on those producing curry powders and mixed spice mixes. State governments have also been directed to perform spice testing to verify that quality requirements are followed. In order to protect public health, the FSSAI intends to conduct monitoring on additional food goods such as fortified rice and dairy products.

Stricter Export Regulations

India's Spices Board has ordered ETO testing for all spice shipments to Hong Kong and Singapore, beginning May 6. According to the Board, all spice consignments bound for these nations must be accompanied by a Spices Board-issued approved analytical report for ETO, including ready-to-eat (RTE) goods.

Global Standards vs. Indian Standards

Despite India's criteria for 30 spices and condiments, export markets like as Hong Kong, Singapore, Maldives and the United States have their own severe rules. Recent bans and recalls in Hong Kong, Maldives and Singapore, as well as US customs rejecting nearly one-third Of MDH's Spice related shipments in last few months, demonstrate disparities between global and Indian regulations.

Brand Responses

In reaction to the allegations MDH and Everest emphasised their dedication to quality and safety. MDH said that it does not utilise ETO throughout any step of spice production, storage, or packaging. Everest confirmed that all of their goods go through stringent quality control tests. Both firms denied being banned in Singapore and Hong Kong, stating that the directions were for a product recall and temporary hold for further examination.